HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 948 of 2025 Court No. - 88 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for opposite party Nos.2 to 6 as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 2 to 6 submits a copy of the order passed by the Court below in the concerned matter, wherein learned Court below has decided the case finally, therefore, the instant revision, which has been filed against the interim order does not stands. 3. On this, learned counsel for the revisionist prays for dismissal of the present revision as withdrawn. 4. As prayed, the instant revision is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. September 26, 2025 NSC Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Devraj Yadav, Satyam Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shailendra Kumar Singh (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Umesh Kumar .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NARENDRA SINGH CHAUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad