Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59266 (AP)

TUMMALAPALLI HANUMANTHA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/14742/2025 · 2025-12-29

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010292572025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14742/2025 Between: 1. TUMMALAPALLI HANUMANTHA RAO, S/O LATE. CHALAPATHI RAO, AGED 68 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 16/289, VENKAT ENCLAVE, GANTA VARI STREET, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. 2. TUMMALAPALLI VINAYAKA RAO, S/O LATE. CHALAPATHI RAO, AGED 63 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 16/289, VENKAT ENCLAVE, GANTA VARI STREET, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE GUDIVADA MUNICIPALITY, GUDIVADA, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, 3. THE FIRE OFFICER, DISASTER RESPONSE AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT, GUDIVADA, GUDIVADA MANDAL OF KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDIVADA, GUDIVADA 2 MANDAL OF KRISHNA DISTRICT 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 7. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUDIVADA. 8. MAHENDRA KUMAR JAIN, S/O LATE AKHERAJ BABULAL, AGED 55 YEARS, OCCUPANT OF DOOR NO. 4/347, 4/349 TILAK ROAD, GUDIVADA - 521301. 9. VISSAMSETTI NAGA MALIKARJUNA RAO, S/O LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. OCCUPANT OF DOOR NO. 4/348, TILAK ROAD, GUDIVADA - 521301. 10. BATTULA VENKATA SUBRAHMANYESWARARAO, S/O LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. OCCUPANT OF DOOR NO. 4/346, TILAK ROAD, GUDIVADA - 521301. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the delay and inaction on the part of the respondents specifically respondent no. 2 to 7 on the representation dated 24.04.2025 made by the petitioners for demolition of petitioners property aged about 100 years at the behest of unofficial respondents no. 8 to 10 as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and also violate of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to demolish the petitioners property situated in R.S.No. 97-1C of Gudivada Municipality, Krishna District having shops bearing Dr.No. 4/346, 4/347, 4/348, 4/349 located at Ward No. 18 of Bantumilli Road at Gudivada, Krishna District by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 24.04.2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents specifically respondents no. 2 to 7 to demolish the Petitioner’s property by considering their representation dated 24.04.2025 pass 3 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Pilla N.V.L.Narayana Aditya Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 4 ORDER:- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 30.12.2025 SCH 5 242 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.14742 of 2025 Date: 30.12.2025 SCH