Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:102905 Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1607 of 2023 Revisionist :- Km. Vandana Singh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Kamalesh Singh,Raghavendra Sharan Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,M J Akhtar Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. Order on delay condonation application 1. Heard Sri Jitendra Sarin, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Raghavendra Sharan Tiwari, learned counsel for revisionists, Sri M.J. Akhtar, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned AGA for the State. 2. The instant revision is beyond time by 196 days and however along with instant revision delay condonation application has been filed but in paragraph-2, revisionists have taken a ground that suddenly deponent suffered with Jaundice, therefore, he could not present the instant revision in time but in support of averment made in paragraph-2, no medical report of either revisionist or deponent has been filed, therefore, ground taken in the instant delay condonation application appears to be vague. 3. In view of this Court on the basis of such vague ground, the delay of 196 days in filing the instant revision should not be condoned. 4. Accordingly, the delay condonation application filed by the revisionist stands dismissed. Order on revision As delay condonation application filed by the revisionists has already been dismissed, therefore, instant revision also stands dismissed being time barred. Order Date :- 2.7.2025 AK Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad