CHINNAKANNU AMMAL v. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION
WP/18936/2025 · 2025-05-22
G R Swaminathan, V Lakshminarayanan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59253 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59253 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 18936 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-05-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 18936 of 2025
1. Chinnakannu Ammal W/o.Munusamy, No.88, Vanniyar Theru, A.Papparapatti, Pennagaram (tk), Dharmapuri District. Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Commissioner Of Land Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The District Collector Dharmapuri District. 3.The District Revenue Officer Dharmapuri District. 4.The Tahsildar Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 5.The Zonal Deputy Director https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 18936 of 2025 Department Of Animal Husbandry, Dharmapuri District. 6.The Village Administrative Officer A.Papparapatti Village, Dharmapuri District. 7.C.Thangavel S/o.Chinnasamy, Vanniyar Theru, A.Pappirapati, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of the petitioner appeal dated 13.03.2025 U/S. 10 of the Land Encroachment Act, 1905 to conduct a detail enquiry on the issuance of eviction notice U/S.6 of the Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and pass orders on merits after giving personal hearing to the petitioner and consequently restrain the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner property in survey No.353 of an extent of 9.83 acre situated at Papparapatti Village, Palcode, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District For Petitioner(s): Mr.Krishnasamy Chinnasamy For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Suresh Government Advocate for R1 to R6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 18936 of 2025 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G. R. Swaminathan J) Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner had suffered an adverse order passed under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act and preferred an appeal under Section 10 of the Act before the second respondent. All that the petitioner wants is disposal of the said appeal. 3. We direct the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's appeal on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till the appeal is disposed of, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. 4. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. (G. R. S., J.) (V. L.N., J.) 22-05-2025 rka/rsi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 18936 of 2025 To 1.The Commissioner Of Land Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The District Collector Dharmapuri District. 3.The District Revenue Officer Dharmapuri District. 4.The Tahsildar Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District.
5.The Zonal Deputy Director Department Of Animal Husbandry, Dharmapuri District. 6.The Village Administrative Officer A.Papparapatti Village, Dharmapuri District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 18936 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN J. AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. rka/rsi WP No. 18936 of 2025 22-05-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis