Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59253 (CAL)

JHUMA PRADHAN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/24209/2025 · 2025-11-13

Suvra Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

35 1133..1111..22002255 Ct. No.26 b.das WPA 24209 of 2025 Smt. Jhuma Pradhan Vs. The State of W. B. & Ors. Mr. Pintu Karar Mr. Sabab Uddin Ms. Meghna Chowdhury …for the petitioner. Heard learned counsels for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. In view of the same, the writ petition has become infructuous and the same is accordingly disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)