CRM-M-29734-2025 1 282 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29734-2025 Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 FARIDA AND OTHERS ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Umesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Dr. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of F.I.R. No.0009 dated 17.01.2025, registered under Sections 115, 127(2), 248(a) and 308(2) of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Bahin, District Palwal and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise. 2. Status report by way of affidavit dated 22.09.2025 of Mohinder Singh, HPS Deputy Superintendent of Police, Hathin, District Palwal filed on behalf of the respondent-State is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. 3. This Court vide order dated 28.05.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send ASGAR ALI 2025.09.25 09:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-29734-2025 2 his/her report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hathin and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 09.06.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 5. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 6. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R. following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 titled as ‘Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another’ and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in (2012) 10 SCC 303 titled as ‘Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others’, this petition is allowed and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise qua petitioner(s), are hereby quashed. (YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) JUDGE 24.09.2025 Ali Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ASGAR ALI 2025.09.25 09:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document