Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010009532025 2025:GAU-AS:5599 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/381/2025 BINOY BIKASH BORA AND ANR S/O- LATE ARUP JYOTI BORA, R/O- U.N.B. ROAD, SILPUKHURI, RIGHT SIDE 3RD BYLANE, HOUSE NO. 135C, GUWAHATI- 781003, ASSAM. 2: ANAMIKA KALITA BORA W/O- LATE ARUP JYOTI BORA R/O- U.N.B. ROAD SILPUKHURI RIGHT SIDE 3RD BYLANE HOUSE NO. 135C GUWAHATI- 78100 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES, CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND LEGAL METROLOGY DEPARTMENTS, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006, ASSAM. 2:THE DIRECTOR FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND LEGAL METROLOGY ASSAM RAM KRISHNA MISSION ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007 ASSAM. Page No.# 2/3 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON DISTRICT ASSAM. 4:THE DISTRICT FOOD SUPPLY OFFICER MORIGAON REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON DISTRICT ASSAM. 5:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON DISTRICT ASSAM. 6:THE INSPECTOR FOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS MORIGAON. 7:THE INSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY MORIGAON ASSAM. 8:THE DIVISIONAL RETAIL HEAD INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED (IOCL) GUWAHATI DIVISIONAL OFFICE 4TH FLOOR EAST POINT TOWER BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI- 781021 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. PADMINI BARUA, MS. RUKMINI BARUA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER Date : 06-05-2025 Heard Ms. P Barua, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. U Das, learned counsel for the State respondents. Page No.# 3/3 2. The counsels for the parties submit that the issue of suspension of the petitioners’ retail outlet trade license is to be decided by the concerned District Commissioner in terms of the order dated 30.04.2025 passed in WA No. 142/2025. They accordingly submit that the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the order dated 30.04.2205 passed in WA No. 142/2025, the writ petition is closed, as infructuous. It is needless to add that in the event the petitioners are aggrieved with the order to be passed by the concerned District Commissioner, a challenge can always be made to the same. JUDGE Comparing Assistant