Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59216 (ALL)

SARITA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/15576/2025 · 2025-05-21

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86438 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15576 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sarita Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R. A. Ram,Vipin Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No.2 to decide the Appeal No. 610/A as well as computerized No. C- 202515000000116 (Anil Pratap Pankaj Vs. Sarita) under section 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, within a stipulated period." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid appeal is pending before respondent no. 2. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned appeal, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 22.5.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad