Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59212 (ALL)

SMT UPASANA PANDEY AND 3 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/15686/2025 · 2025-05-29

Avnish Saxena, Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar J Cpc

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93306-DB Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15686 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Upasana Pandey And 3 Others Respondent :- The State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ranjeet Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Arindam Sinha,J. Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J. 1. Mr. Ranjeet Asthana, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioners and submits, petitioner no.4 and private respondent no.5 got acquainted. Subsequently, respondent no.5 is causing respondent no.4 (the Station House Officer) to unnecessarily summon petitioners to the thana. His clients have not been told of complaint made, let alone FIR registered. He seeks interference. 2. Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned advocate, Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State. 3. We are not inclined to direct issuance of notice on respondent no.5. Instead, respondent no.4 is directed to act strictly in accordance with provisions under section 35 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023 and not otherwise. In event petitioners are to be called to the thana, there must be written communication disclosing particulars of complaint/FIR registered. Petitioner will communicate certified copy of this order to respondent no.4. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Mohini (Arindam Sinha, J.) (Avnish Saxena, J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHINI RAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad