IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 WRIT PETITION NO. 535 OF 2020 Fulchand Somaji Hingle VERSUS The Branch Manger / Authorised Officer Bank Of Barod Erstwhile Dena Bank ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Urgunde Suhas P. None present for respondent. ... CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT & ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. Dated : NOVEMBER 11, 2025 PER COURT : - 1. Since, in this writ petition, the challenge is to the action taken under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, we are not inclined to entertain it in view of the alternate remedy available to the petitioner under Section 17 of the Act. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, therefore seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition to avail the alternate remedy under Section 17 of the said Act. 3. Leave is granted. Page 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:30922-DB 904 WP 535-2020 4. The writ petition is thus disposed off as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5. It is made clear that the time spent in prosecuting this writ petition shall be considered while dealing with the issue of delay, if the petitioner avails the alternate remedy available under the law. ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( R. G. AVACHAT, J. ) vj gawade/-. Page 2 of 2