(1) 909criapln152.19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 152 OF 2019 MANOJ S/O. RAJENDRAPRASAD SHUKLA AND OTHERS ….Applicants VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR …..Respondents Mr. M. P. Kale, Advocate h/f Mr. P. N. Muley, Advocate for the applicants Mr. P. S. Patil, Addl. PP for the respondents/State Mr. N. L. Jadhav, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2025 P. C. 1. Learned Addl.P. P. submits that the matter has been proceeded further and even a statement under Section 313 of the Cr. P. C. has also been recorded. 2. Under such circumstance, we do not find this is to be a fit case to exercise our power under Section 482 of the Cr. P. C. 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:24300-DB (2) 909criapln152.19 3. Let the trial to take its logical end. 4. In view of above, the criminal application stands dismissed. [HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.] VishalK/909criapln152.19 2 of 2