APHC010811912018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.39170 OF 2018 Between: 1. Smt. S.Sampurnamma,, W/o.Late Gopala Achari, Hindu, aged about 88 years, Occ.Cultivation, Resident of Gantavaripalle Village, Jakkadona Post, Vedurukuppam Mandal, Chittoor District, and another. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, and others. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Ms.Kalla Tulasi Durgamba Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Assignment The Court made the following ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondent No.2 and his subordinates in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject matter property of an extent of Ac.0.86 cents in Survey No.811/3 and Ac.1.63 cents in Survey No.811/2 of Jakkadona Village as illegal, arbitrary etc., and for consequential directions. 2 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners made submissions with reference to the averments made in the writ affidavit and the material filed along with the same. It is her contention that at the behest of respondent No.3, the respondent No.2 is making attempts to interfere with the above said extents of land in high-handed manner and therefore, the petitioners are constrained to file the present writ petition. She also submits that in fact the petitioners filed O.S.No.218 of 2018 against the respondent No.3 and others before the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Puttur for permanent injunction in respect of the same property and interim order was passed on 03.10.2018 in I.A. No.1160 of 2018 restraining the respondents/defendants therein from interfering with the abovementioned property and further the said suit was decreed on 04.8.2023. She submits that on 31.10.2018 after considering the submissions an interim order was granted by this Court directing the respondents not to evict the petitioners without following due process of law. She further submits that the said interim order was extended on 14.11.2018 and the same is in force. 3. Mr.K.Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on the other hand, made submissions with reference to the latest instructions dated 27.12.2025 received from the respondent No.2. In the said instructions, it is asserted that the official respondents are not interfering with the writ petition schedule properties. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides and perusing the said instructions, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition more particularly in the light of the order dated 31.10.2018. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, providing that no coercive action in respect of the subject matter properties shall be 3 initiated without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J December 29, 2025. vasu