CRM-M-59417- IN THE H (230) BHUVINDER KU STATE OF PUNJ CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. S MANISHA BATR 1. The 483 of Bharatiya N of regular bail in under Sections 10 (for short “BNS Section 109(1), 12 Act) at Police Stat 2. As p accused was stand accused and 5-6 p Ali, Moon and Sh towards the com thereafter, they fl -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH ER KUMAR @ BOBINDER @ BUV Versus
PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Puneet Bali, Advocate for the pet Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed atiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in case arising out of FIR No.10 109(1), 125, 351(2) and 61(2) of BNS”) and Section 25 of Arms Ac (1), 125, 351(2), 191(3) and 190 of ce Station City 1, District Malerkotla. As per the allegations, on the nig standing on the roof of his house, the 6 persons unknown to him came ou and Shahil @ Mohd. Sahil fired shots complainant and his mother, who hey fled away while extending threa JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-59417-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.02.2026 BUVAN ... Petitioner
...Respondent
ANISHA BATRA
the petitioner by the petitioner under Section , 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for grant 103 dated 14.05.2025 registered 2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 s Act (and charges framed under 90 of BNS and Section 25 of Arms . he night of 14.05.2025, when the the accused Mohammad Kaif, co- ame outside his house. The accused d shots in the air as well as pointed who had a narrow escape and threats to the complainant. After M) 2026 ction grant tered 2023 nder rms the - used ted and After AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-59417- registration of FIR Kaif, Mohd. Ali a Mohd. Rasid and accused Azam @ remaining accused concluded. 3. It is a falsely implicated been attributed to purpose. He has deserves to be allo 4. Status learned State cou There are chances benefit of bail. It allowed. 5. This C at considerable len 6. The unlawful assembly the assembly, he complainant and h incident. The pet -2025 (O&M) 2 of FIR investigation proceedings were . Ali and Shah Moon were arrested d and Mohd. Sahil were arrested on 2 am @ Azam Jungli were apprehe ccused were also arrested subsequen It is argued by learned counsel for t icated in this case. He is in custody s ted to him. His further incarceration e has clean antecedents. It is, ther be allowed. Status report and custody certificate h te counsel that the allegations again ances of his absconding or committin ail. It is, therefore, argued that the p This Court has heard the rival submis ble length. The petitioner is alleged to have sembly with the co-accused and in pro ly, he had allegedly fired shots w t and his family members. However, n he petitioner is in custody since 26.0 s were initiated. The accused Mohd. rested on 16.05.2025. The accused d on 21.05.2025. The petitioner and pprehended on 25.06.2025. The equently. Investigation now stands l for the petitioner that he has been tody since long. No specific act has eration would not serve any useful therefore, urged that the petition icate have been filed. It is argued by against him are serious in nature. mitting similar offences, if extended t the petition does not deserve to be ubmissions made by both the parties have formed membership of an prosecution of common object of hots with an attempt to kill the ever, none had received injury in the e 26.06.2025. Investigation already ohd. used r and The tands been t has ul tition d by re. nded to be rties f an ct of the n the eady AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-59417- stands completed. no prosecution wi of law that pre sentencing and ev detention prior to allegations, the pe above discussed f out a case for rel petitioner is order well as surety bon Magistrate/Duty M -2025 (O&M) 3 leted. The trial will obviously take co ion witness has been examined so far. -trial incarceration should not b and even bail is the rule and jail i rior to trial should not be punitive the period spent by the petitioner in ssed facts, this Court is of the opinio for released on bail. Accordingly, th ordered to be released on bail subjec ty bonds to the satisfaction of the lea uty Magistrate concerned and on the (i) The petitioner shall not di inducement, threat or promise the facts of the case or tamper in any manner whatsoever. (ii) The petitioner shall no circumstance without permiss (iii) The petitioner shall appea of hearing. (iv) The petitioner shall prov well as present address before of furnishing of bonds and without informed the trial Cou ake considerable time to conclude as so far. It is well settled proposition not be replica of post conviction jail is an exception. Moreso the unitive. Given the nature of the ner in custody and in view of the opinion that the petitioner has made gly, the petition is allowed and the subject to his furnishing personal as he learned trial Court/Chief Judicial n the following conditions:- not directly or indirectly make any omise to any person acquainted with tamper with the evidence of the case ll not leave the country under any ermission of the learned trial Court. appear before each and every date ll provide his permanent address as before the Ld. Trial Court at the time s and shall not change the same ial Court. e as ition ction the the f the ade d the al as icial any with case any as time same AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-59417- 7. In the petitioner, it shall application seekin 8. It is, be construed as an and shall not influ 9. Since any, is rendered in 12.02.2026 Amit Sharma

-2025 (O&M) 4 (v) The petitioner shall also g PAN card if any and details o to the learned trial Court at th and in case, any change in hi place, then he shall inform a trial Court in advance and switched on all times. (vii) The petitioner shall surre the learned Trial Court. In the event of there being any FIR t shall be open to the respondent-State seeking cancellation of bail. It is, however, clarified that the obse d as an expression of opinion of this C t influence the outcome of the trial in a Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes 
 

also give copy of his Aadhar Card, tails of his mobile phone number(s) rt at the time of furnishing of bonds e in his mobile phone number takes form about the same to the learned and shall keep his mobile phone ll surrender his passport, if any, with y FIR/complaint lodged against the State to seek redressal by filing an e observations made above shall not this Court on the merits of the case ial in any manner.
allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
ard, er(s) onds takes rned hone with t the g an l not case n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.