THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA. v. MAHADEO DEORAM PARKALE and OTHERS.
FA/444/2003 · 2025-12-02
Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59175 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59175 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
935-fa-444-2003 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 444 OF 2003 The State Of Maharashtra. …..PLAINTIFF (Ori. Defendant) VERSUS
1. Mahadeo Deoram Parkale, Age Major
2. Vithal Pandharinath Parkele, Age: Major,
3. Lalu Pandharinath Parkale, Age: Major,
4. Gangubai Lalu Parkale, Age: Major …..DEFENDANT (Ori. Plaintiff) ... Mr. D. J. Patil, AGP for Appellant-State
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATED : 02nd DECEMBER, 2025 PER COURT :-
1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and award passed by the learned Reference Court, Ahmednagar in Land Acquisition Reference No.241 of 1986, dated 06.12.1989.
2. The learned Reference Court enhanced the amount of compensation @Rs.4350/-.
3. Heard learned AGP Mr. D. J. Patil for Appellant-State. He pointed out the resolutions of the State Government dated 03.11.2016 and 23.02.2017, whereby the State Government has taken a policy 2025:BHC-AUG:33460
935-fa-444-2003 -2- decision that if the amount of compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court in rural areas is less than four times, then such appeals shall not be filed and proceeded further.
4. Considering the aforesaid policy decision, the First Appeal deserves to be disposed of without considering the merits. Hence, the following order:
ORDER a. First Appeal is disposed of as infructuous. b. Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) Rushikesh/2025