APHC010642552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 33247/2025 Between: 1. YANDAPU VIGNESWARI, W/O. Y SATYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED 63 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 3-137/2, GANGANAMMA GUDI STREET, KANNAPURAM VILLAGE, KOYALAGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE ADDITIONAL AGENT TO GOVERNMENT, PROJECT OFFICER, ITDA, KR PURAM, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU. 3. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONIAL OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU. 4. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLAVARAM SUB- DIVISION, ELURU DISTRICT. 5. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, BUTTAIGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 6. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BUTTAIGUDEM P.S., BUTTAIGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declare the action of the Respondents in not providing protection to the Petitioners land covered in R.S.No.140/11 an extent of Ac.1.06 cts and R.S.N0.162/2A an extent of Ac.4.27 cts situated at Koyarajamundry Village. Buttaigudem Mandal, Eluru District as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the Provision of APSALT Reg. 1/59 as Amended by 1/70 and consequently direct the Respondents to arrange necessary protection to the Petitioners land covered in R.S.No.140/11 an extent of Ac.1.06 cts and R.S.No.162/2A an extent of Ac.4.27 cts situated at Koyarajamundry Village, Buttaigudem Mandal, Eluru District by following the Orders in SR No.79/2023 dated 30-11-2023 and as per the proceedings of RDO Jangareddygudem in ROC No.602/2024/ dated 15-10-2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to arrenge necessary protection to the Petitioner land covered in R.S.No.140/11 an extent of Ac.1.06 cts extent of Ac.4.27 cts situated atand R.S.N0.162/2A an Koyarajamundry Village, Buttaigudem Mandal, Eluru District as and required for cultivation of Petitioner land from the objectors pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring declare the action of the Respondents in not providing protection to the Petitioners land covered in R.S.No.140/11 an extent of Ac.1.06 cts and R.S.N0.162/2A an extent of Ac.4.27 cts situated at Koyarajamundry Village, Buttaigudem Mandal, Eluru District as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the Provision of APSALT Reg. 1/59 as Amended by 1/70 and consequently direct the Respondents to arrange necessary protection to the Petitioners land covered in R.S.No.140/11 an extent of Ac.1.06cts and R.S.No.162/2A an extent of Ac.4.27cts situated at Koyarajamundry Village, Buttaigudem Mandal, Eluru District by following the Orders in SR No.79/2023 dated 30-11-2023 and as per the proceedings of RDO Jangareddygudem in ROC No.602/2024/ dated 15-10-2024 and to pass….” 2. Heard M/s. P.R.K.Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. During the course of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondent nos.4 to 6, on written instructions, has submitted that the Station House Officer, Buttaigudem requested the petitioner to intimate the date and time of cultivating the subject lands and also asked the names of the persons who are interfering while cultivating the subject lands for providing protection while cultivating the said lands. 4 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that, by recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition may be disposed of. 5. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 30.12.2025 RD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.33247 of 2025 30.12.2025 RD