Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59161 (PNJ)

JASPAL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/27099/2025 · 2025-05-19

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 129 JASPAL SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under seeking issuance of matter and to take appropriate action against respondents No.4 and 5 and to his representation dated 04.04.2025 (Annexure P 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitioner the Senior Superintendent grievances as mentioned considered and no action this stage, the petitioner would to respondent No. aforesaid representation filed by the thereon. 3. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: JASPAL SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Priyanshu Kamra, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under seeking issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to look into the matter and to take appropriate action against respondents No.4 and 5 and to his representation dated 04.04.2025 (Annexure P-2 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on Superintendent of Police, Rupnagar (Annexure P mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.27099 of 2025 Date of decision: 19.05.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to look into the matter and to take appropriate action against respondents No.4 and 5 and to his 2). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted recently filed a representation on 04.04.2025 before Rupnagar (Annexure P-2) raising his petition but the same has not yet been been taken thereon. He further submitted that at satisfied if appropriate directions are issued of Police, Rupnagar to decide the petitioner and take necessary action Section 528 of BNSS directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to look into the matter and to take appropriate action against respondents No.4 and 5 and to his submitted before his petition but the same has not yet been further submitted that at satisfied if appropriate directions are issued decide the necessary action Jyoti 2025.05.20 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM 4. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab, accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a co supplied to her 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a directi representation period of one month 19.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRM-M No.27099 of 2025 Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab, accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 04.04.2025 (Annexure P one month, by passing a speaking order in (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No M No.27099 of 2025 -2- Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the mplete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed on to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-2) of the petitioner within a , by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in Court, has the paperbook be , without disposed the aforesaid of the petitioner within a Jyoti 2025.05.20 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document