1 2025:CGHC:56583 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6172 of 2023 1 - Smt. Seema Maravi W/o- Pokhraj Maravi Aged About 43 Years Presently Posted As In-Charge Principal, At Govt. High School, Banki, Development Block- Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh, R/o- Sonkar City, Phase-2, Mungeli, District- Mungeli, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Public Instructions And Department Of School Education, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Indravati Bhawan, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Department Of School Education, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Indravati Bhawan, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Divisional Joint Director Public Education Department, Bilaspur Division, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 5 - Rupchand Patle S/o- Saroj Sen W/o- Bharat Kumar Sen, Presently Posted As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government High School, Bakli, Fingeshwar, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh P I N- 493885 ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prashant Dansena, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Amitesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 20/11/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the records pertaining to the case of the petitioner from the respondent authorities concerned for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court, in the facts and circumstances of the case, may be pleased to quash/set aside the letter dated 20.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) & 18.08.2023 (Annexure P-2), in the interest of justice. 10.3 Cost of the proceedings. 10.4 Any other writs and directions that may be deemed fit and just in the facts & circumstances of case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset submits that the cause of action for filing this petition has been come to an end and as such he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in case exigency arises. 3. No objection has been raised from other sides. 3 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat