2025:JHHC:13180 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 124 of 2023 Mahwa Minz, S/o Gondla Minj, R/o Tigra Ganga Toli, PO-Guru, PS- Ratu, District-Ranchi … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Chandra Shekhar, Inspector General, Registration, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi … … Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. Gaurav Raj, AC to AAG-II ----- 39/02.05.2025 Mr. Gaurav Raj, AC to AAG-II appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, refers to paragraph nos. 9 and 10 of the show cause affidavit 30.04.2025, which read as under: “9. That it is humbly stated and submitted that on receipt of advice of the learned Additional Advocate General, Government of Jharkhand, the matter was re-examined in accordance with Rule 12 of Bihar Society Registration Rules, 1965, and a reasoned order dated 24.04.2025 has been passed. 10. That it is humbly stated and submitted that the reasoned order dated 24.04.2025 is being submitted along with this affidavit as contained in memo no. 2022/28/ni dated 24.04.2025.” 2. It is thus submitted that in compliance of the aforesaid order of this Court, memo no. 2022/28/ni dated 24.04.2025 has been passed by the opposite party no. 2. 3. Considering the aforesaid submission, there is no need to further proceed in the contempt petition. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite party no. 2 is hereby dropped. 4. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish