SARUBAI SURESH MAGAR AND ORS v. KIRAN VASUDEO HALDE AND ORS
CA/12959/2022 · 2025-02-04
Shri Sandipkumar C More
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59137 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59137 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CA12959.2022.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12959 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 23258 OF 2022 SARUBAI SURESH MAGAR AND OTHERS VERSUS KIRAN VASUDEO HALDE AND OTHERS … Advocate for Applicants : Mr. P.C. Mayure h/f. Mr. S.S. Chapalgaonkar …
CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
DATE : 17TH DECEMBER, 2025 PER COURT :
1. Not on board. Taken on board.
2. Learned Advocate for the applicant's request to extend the time to deposit the cost of Rs. 2,000/-, which he failed to deposit within the stipulated time.
3. Considering the nature of the matter, I deem it appropriate to grant a further one week’s time to deposit the costs as per the said
order, subject to payment of additional costs of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees one thousand) to be deposited in the High Court Bar Association Library within one week. 2025:BHC-AUG:35677
2 CA12959.2022.odt
4. Needless to clarify, clause 4 of the said order needs to be modified, as it is made clear that applicants /claimants shall not be entitled to claim any interest till the registration of the appeal, rather than for the aforesaid delay period, as the applicants failed to comply with the order in time.
( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) SPC