AYEDA BEGUM v. GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and 5 ORS.
WP(C)/897/2016 · 2025-03-09
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5913 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5913 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010008772016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/897/2016 AYEDA BEGUM W/O MD. EYAKUB ALI, R/O HOUSE NO.35, ARYA PATH, P.O. GOPINATH NAGAR, GHY-16 VERSUS GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and 5 ORS.
REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, G.M.C.H. ROAD, BHANGAGARH, GHY-5 2:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GMDA G.M.C.H. ROAD BHANGAGARH GHY-5 3:GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER PANBAZAR GHY-1 4:THE COMMISSIONER GMC PANBAZAR GHY-1 5:MD. MOTIN MOMIN S/O MD. ABU BAKKAR MONDAL 6:ABDUL AZIZ S/O LT. YUNUS ALI NOS. 5 and 6 ARE R/O H/NO.35
Page No.# 2/2 ARYA PATH P.O. GOPINATH NAGAR GHY-1 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KATAKI, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, GMC, MD.K ALI (R- 5&6),MR. K SAIKIA (R- 5&6),MR. R K BHUYAN (R- 5&6),MR. R RABHA (R- 5&6),MS. M HAZARIKA,SC, G M D A
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 10.03
.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call. However, Mr. S. Bora, learned standing counsel, GMC is present. It is noticed that in earlier two consecutive dates, i.e. 13.12.2019 and 11.01.2021, none appears for the petitioner. +Therefore, it appears that the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant