1 / 3 2025:CGHC:55408 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 8081 of 2025 Kishori Vishwakarma S/o Kapil Vishwakarma Aged About 36 Years R/o Tulsi Police Station Simga, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapaara Chhattisgarh. (Description of applicant is mentioned as Per Charge Sheet ) ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Station House Officer Police of Police Station Simga, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapaara Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Anil Kumar Gulati, Advocate along with Ms. Gunja Taram, Advocate For State /Respondent : Ms. Priya Sharma, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 13/11/2025 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail as he has been arrested on 09/08/2025 in connection with Crime No.425/2025, registered at Police Station- Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, C.G., for the offence punishable under Sections 75 & 331 (2) of the BNSS and Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.11.19 15:48:02 +0530 2 / 3 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that, on the basis of written report lodged by the father of the victim, the police registered the offence and as per the averment of the written report, it is alleged that in the month of May, 2025, he along with his wife went to Pune (Maharashtra) for his livelihood and left two minor daughters at the house of neighbours and after a week he received a call from the victim where it has been informed that on 27/05/2025 at about 12.30, the applicant entered into the house and with intention to outrage her modesty caught the victims. Thereafter, the applicant was arrested. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would contend that there was a land dispute between the father of the applicant and granddaughter of the victim, therefore, the false report has been lodged just to implicate the applicant. He would next contend that the father of the applicant has also lodged the report and a civil suit is also pending. He would next contend that the applicant is in jail since 09/08/2025 and final conclusion of the trial will take sufficient time, therefore, the applicant may kindly be enlarged on bail. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application submitted by the applicant. 5. Father of the victim appeared through the concerned DLSA and he raised objection with regard to grant of bail to the applicant. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length, perused the case and other materials available on record with utmost circumspection. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and 3 / 3 further considering the nature of offence and the manner in which the offence has been committed as the applicant entered into the house of the victim when the girls were alone in the house and thereby tried to outrage the modesty of the victim/girls and the objection raised by the father of the victim, I am not inclined to release the applicant on bail. 8. Accordingly, the present MCRC stands rejected. SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu