Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5911 (ALL)

DR. VIRESH SAXENA AND 19 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/1034/2025 · 2025-03-03

Neeraj Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30410 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1034 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Viresh Saxena And 19 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Singh,Shraddha Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Pranjal Mehrotra,C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, Sri Ashish Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and learned standing counsel for State-respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents especially the respondent No.2 and 6 to grant the honorarium and other emoluments to the petitioners as enhanced and fixed to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- per month, in pursuance of the letter No.179/SPMU/NHM/District Walk in/2024- 25/4150 dated 12.09.2024 falling since 01.04.2024 till the completion of the tenure of contracts. b). Issue a writ, order or direction of a suitable nature commanding the respondent No.2 to consider the claim of the petitioners and decide the pending representation dated 18.07.2024." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that for redressal of their grievance, petitioners have filed representation dated 18.07.2024 before respondent No.2, but no decision has been taken till date. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the representation within a stipulated time. 4. Learned Standing counsel submitted that petitioners may be directed to file fresh representation before respondent No.2 (Mission Director, National Health Mission, U.P.). He further submitted that in case any such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided at the earliest. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to move fresh representation along with certified copy of this order before respondent No.2 within two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the same in accordance with law maximum within a period of two months, thereafter. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No.2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Amit Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad