APHC010337982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 17175/2025 Between: 1. M. PENCHALA NARASA REDDY, S/O. AKKI REDDY AGE 58 YEARS, R/O. MARLAPUDI VILLAGE SYDAPURAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRIC ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SYDAPURAM MANDAL SYDAPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 5. CHEERLA VENKU REDDY, S/O. PEDA VENKU REDDY AGE 55 YEARS, R/O. MARLAPUDI VILLAGE SYDAPURAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring i) the action of the 4th respondent in not 2 mutating the name of the petitioner for the land admeasuring Ac. 0.80 cents in Sy. No. 414-3 of Kommipadu Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, pursuant to the petitioners application No. MUT250521098577 dated 21.05.2025, and ii) the action of the respondents in attempting to interfere with the petitioners possession and enjoyment of his land admeasuring Ac. 0.80 cents in Sy. No. 414-3 of Kommipadu Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, as illegal, arbitrary, mala fide, discriminatory, contrary to law, against the principles of natural justice, and violative of ConstitutionArticle 300A of and consequentially the of India, i) direct the 4th respondent to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the land admeasuring Ac. 0.80 cents in Sy. No. 414-3 of Kommipadu Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, duly considering the petitioners application No. datedMUT250521098577 21.05.2025, and ii) direct the 4threspondent not to interfere with the petitioners possession and enjoyment of his land admeasuring Ac. 0.80 cents in Sy. No. 414-3 of Kommipadu Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of his land admeasuring Ac. 0.80 cents in Sy. No. 414-3 of Kommipadu Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, pending disposal of the above writ petition, in the interest of justice, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Vacate the Interim Orders passed in lA No. 1 / 2025 in WP No. 17175 / 2025 dated 10.07.2025 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. K RAMA KOTESWARA RAO 3 This Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by the Petitioner, for the following relief: “to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.4 in not mutating the name of the petitioner for the land admeasuring Ac.0.80 cents in Sy.No.414-3 of Kommipadu village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, pursuant to the petitioner’s application No.MUT250521098577, dated 21.05.2025 and further the action of respondents in attempting to interfere with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of subject land as illegal and arbitrary” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. 3. Though the learned counsel for the 5th respondent has made several allegations in the counter, at the time of hearing, he placed the reliance of the order passed by the 4th respondent rejecting the case of the petitioner, on the status, and submits that in view of the said orders the Writ Petition became infructuous and if at all the petitioner has any grievance, he has to avail the statutory remedies. 4. Replying to the said contentions, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though its status shows the application 4 has been rejected but so far the petitioner has not received any reasoned order to avail the statutory remedies. 5. Considering the submissions made by both the learned counsels, as already the authority has considered the application made by the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case, hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 4th respondent, if any reasoned order is passed, the same may be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, if no orders have been passed, the 4th respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as 5th respondent and pass an appropriate reasoned orders within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. After passing orders, the petitioner is at liberty to avail statutory remedies as per the provisions of ROR Act. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH Dt: 29.12.2025 sj 5 52 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.17175 of 2025 Dt: 29.12.2025 sj