Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59100 (AP)

KAMISETTI JAYAKRISHNA v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/26888/2025 · 2025-12-28

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010505392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26888/2025 Between: 1. KAMISETTI JAYAKRISHNA, S/O SRI VENKATA MOHANA RAO AGE 47 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O DOOR NO. 3-101, MOPIDEVI - 521 125, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, SASTRY BHAVAN, DR. RAJENDER PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 001 2. THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD, REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL RETAIL HEAD, GVR COMPLEX, 2ND AND 3RD FLOORS, BHARATHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA - 520 007 NTR DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRIT AT MACHILIPATNAM - 521 001. 4. KAMISETTI VENKATA SURESH BABU, S/O SRI KRISHNANJANEYULU, R/O AVANIGADDA ROAD, MOPIDEVI - 521 125, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in 2 the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in proposing to establish a retail outlet at RS.No. 249-14, in an extent of Ac. 0.14 Cents in Mopidevi Village and Mandal, Krishna District, which is adjacent to PWD Canal (Mopidevi Channel No. 11), feeding an ayacut of 6,350 Acres for paddy cultivation as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the Guidelines/Norms of the Central Pollution Control Board and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to grant licenses for installation of the retail outlet at RS.No. 249- 14, in an extent of Ac. 0.14 Cents in Mopidevi Village and Mandal, Krishna District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent authorities not to permit the 2nd and 4th respondents to install the retail outlet at RS.No. 249-14, in an extent of Ac.0.14 Cents in Mopidevi Village and Mandal, Krishna District, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to vacate the interim order of status quo dated 26.09.2025 passed in W.P. No. 26888 of 2025, and extended from time to time and dismiss the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DILIP JAYARAM S (CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) 2. ASHOK RAM V 3. AVANIJA INUGANTI 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri N.Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated:29.12.2025 KS 4 80 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26888/2025 Dated 29.12.2025 KS