Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59089 (CHH)

M/S MOKSHIT CORPORATION CHOPDA GROUP v. UNION OF INDIA

WPT/89/2024 · 2025-11-16

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:55792 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 89 of 2024 M/s Mokshit Corporation Chopda Group 1, G. E. Road, Ganjpara, Durg District- Durg Chhattisgarh Through Its Partner Shri Shanti Lal Chopra S/o Late, Shri Champa Lal Chopda, aged about 60 years, R/o. Chopda Compound Azad Ward- 37, Ganjpara, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India Through Its Secretary Department Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance, Government Of India North Block, New Delhi- 110001. 011-23094856 E- Mail- Rsecy@Nic.In, District : New Delhi, Delhi 2 - Additional Director General, Directorate General Of Goods And Service Tax Intelligence, (DGGI) Zonal Unit- Raipur, 4th Floor, Rio Complex, Fruit Market, Lalpur Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Maneesh Sharma, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 17.11.2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to admit the instant Writ Petition in favour of the Writ Petitioner & against the Respondents & thereafter, to set aside & quash the impugned search & seizure conducted in the premises of the Writ Petitioner & to also set aside & BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2025.11.18 11:49:12 +0530 2 quash all the consequential investigation & related action undertaken by the Respondents therein being illegal, unlawful, bad in law & without jurisdiction. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to award the cost of the present Petition to the Writ Petitioner. 10.3 Any other relief may also be granted by this Hon'ble court in facts and circumstances of the case. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this petition. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has no objection on the prayer of the petitioner. 4. On due consideration, prayer of the petitioner is allowed and he is permitted to withdraw this petition. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini