Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5908 (KAR)

YAMANAPPA S/O SHIVANAPPA CHIGARADDI v. ASHOK S/O RAMU KORAVI @ MANE

MFA.CROB/100021/2022 · 2025-02-05

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2237 MFA.CROB No. 100021 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MFA CROSS OBJ NO.100021 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI YAMANAPPA S/O. SHIVANAPPA CHIGARADDI, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: AT POST LAKSHANATTI, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-591126. …CROSS OBJECTOR (BY SRI SIDDAPPA SAJJAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI ASHOK S/O. RAMU KORAVI @ MANE, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: CRAFTSMAN AND MASON, NOW NIL, R/O: C/O DAGADU KORAVI, MANGANKODI ROAD, H.M. SPORTS, IDAGA MASJID, NANDANI, TQ: SHIROL, DIST: KOLHAPUR. 2. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, 9, ROHIT CHAMBERS, 5TH FLOOR, JANMBHOOMI MARG, FORT-MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA-400001, THROUGH ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT JAMKHANDI, TQ: JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA CROSS OBJECTION IN MFA NO.102884/2018 IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04.04.2018, IN MVC NO.54/2015 PASSED BY THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL XIV, MUDHOL AND MAY KINDLY BE PLEASED SADDLING THE LIABILITY ON RESPONDENT NO.2 BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS MFA CROSS OBJECTION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2237 MFA.CROB No. 100021 of 2022 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) Though four opportunities were given for compliance of office objections, but have been not complied with. Today also for fifth time, the matter is posted for non compliance of office objections, but there is no representation for the cross objector nor there is compliance of office objections. Therefore, the cross appeal stands dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE SRA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 74