1 2025:CGHC:55764 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1085 of 2024 1 - P. Ravinarayan S/o Late P. Laxman Murthy Aged About 54 Years R/o 302, Zonal Market, Sector -10, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - P. Geetanjali W/o Shri P. Ravinarayan Aged About 45 Years R/o 302, Zonal Market, Sector -10, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - P. Sarla Devi W/o Late P. Laxman Murthy Aged About 72 Years R/o 302, Zonal Market, Sector -10, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - D. Trinath S/o Shri D. Prakash Rao Aged About 58 Years R/o 4-A/47, Maitri Nagar, Risali Nagar, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Richa Prakash Chaudhary The Collector, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Devesh Kumar Dhruv The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, H.Q. Supela, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) CONT No. 1051 of 2024 1 - P. Rajkumar S/o Chandrashekhar Aged About 44 Years R/o 302, Zonal Market, Sector-10, Bhilai Nagar, District - Durg Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Richa Prakash Chaudhary The Collector, District Durg Chhattisgarh (Proposed Respondent) 2 - Devesh Kumar Dhruv The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai H.Q. Supela, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) and CONT No. 1068 of 2024 1 - P. Shakuntala W/o Shri P. Chandrashekhar, Aged About 43 Years R/o 302, Zonal Market, Sector-10, Bhilai Tahsil District- Durg (C.G.) ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Richa Prakash Chaudhary The Collector, District-Durg (C.G.) 2 - Devesh Kumar Dhruv, The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai H.Q. Supela, Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents For Applicants : None. For Res. No. 1 : Mr. Venkatesh Pandey, Advocate. ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.11.18 11:03:24 +0530 2 For Res. No. 2 : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate along with Mr. Manas Vajpai, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 17/11 /2025 1. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 would submit that the order passed by this Court on 09.04.2024 in WPC No. 2085/2022 & other connected matters, has been complied with as they have decided the representations preferred by the applicants. 2. Since the order passed by this Court has been complied with, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court in these petitions at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the contempt petitions are disposed of. 4. However, the applicants are at liberty to challenge the action taken by the respondents, if they are not satisfied. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun