Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59076 (PNJ)

M/S MISHM INTERNATIONAL v. SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA AND ORS

CWP/1091/2017 · 2025-08-27

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206 CWP-1091-2017 Date of Decision:27.08.2025 M/S MISHM INTERNATIONAL ...PETITIONER VERSUS SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, Advocate and Mr. Shrenik Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Karan S. Gill, Advocate for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. Mr. C.L. Verma, Advocate for respondent No.3. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Order dated 13.01.2023 has not been complied with despite grant of repeated opportunities, imposition of costs and even dismissal for non-prosecution. On the previous date, this Court passed the following order:- “On 01.05.2025, this Court passed the following order:- Sheetal 2025.08.27 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CWP-1091-2017 -2- “Till date the compliance of order dated 13.01.2023 has not been made. Last and final opportunity is afforded to the petitioner to establish before this Court that the machines that has been procured by the petitioner are in fact the same product as has been contemplated under the Capital Incentive Subsidy Scheme of the respondents. Adjourned to 19.07.2025.” Request for deferment has been made on behalf of arguing counsel for the petitioner. List on 27.08.2025.” 2. Once again, a request has been made for deferment to comply with aforesaid order. 3. Request is declined. 4. Petition is dismissed. 27.08.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.08.27 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh