Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59069 (CAL)

PRIYANKA ROY v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA(P)/368/2025 · 2025-10-29

Smita Das De, Sujoy Paul

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29.10.2025 Item No.52 Ct. No.1 Saikat Mukherjee WPA(P)/368/2025 PRIYANKA ROY VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Mr. Bhaskar Roy, Adv. Ms. Megha Chanda, Adv. …For the Petitioner Mr. Sukanta Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Praloy Bhattacharya, Adv. …For the UOI Mr. Satyendra Agarwal, Adv. …For the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 (E.C.L.) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this PIL with a liberty to file a writ of quo warranto against the appointment of Respondent No.5. 2. The other sides are represented by Mr. Chakraborty and Mr. Agarwal, learned counsels. 3. The PIL is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. [SUJOY PAUL, CJ (ACTING)] (SMITA DAS DE, J.)