IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 CM-7596-CWP-2025 in RA-CW-235-2025 in CWP-28391-2022 Date of Decision: 26.05.2025 Suman Kalra ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI ---- Present: Mr. Shashikant Gupta, Advocate for the review applicant/petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Singh Mann, Additional Advocte General, Haryana. **** Anil Kshetarpal, J. (Oral) CM-7596-CWP-2025 in RA-CW-235-2025 For the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay which is supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. The delay of 18 days in filing the review application, is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RA-CW-235-2025 in CWP-28391-2022 1. On 20.03.2025, the following order was passed: “1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in CWP-4769- 2020. VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.05.28 17:59 I attest to the accuracy of this order/judgment PHHC CM-7596-CWP-2025 in RA-CW-235-2025 in -2- CWP-28391-2022 2. Learned Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, does not dispute, the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Therefore, the instant writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the verdict rendered by this Court today in CWP- 4769-2020, titled as Anil Kumar Yadav and others vs. State of Punjab and others.” 2. The correctness of the stand of the counsel representing the petitioner in paragraph No.2 of the order is not disputed. 3. In view of the aforesaid, no ground to review is made out. 4. Dismissed. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) May 26, 2025 JUDGE Varinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.05.28 17:59 I attest to the accuracy of this order/judgment PHHC