Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5906 (GAU)

BHADRA KANTA SARMA v. STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS.

WP(C)/60/2017 · 2025-09-18

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010009552017 2023:GAU-AS:12624 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/60/2017 BHADRA KANTA SARMA S/O. LT. NIRAN SARMA, VILL. SARUTHEKERABARI, P.O. RANGAMATI, P.S. MANGALDAI, DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM. VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS. REP. BY ITS COMM. and SECY. TO THE GOVT. F ASSAM, EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.-06. 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM EDUCATION SECONDARY DEPTT. DISPUR. 3:THE DIRECTOR SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI. 4:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS DARRANG DIVISION CIRCLE MANGALDAI Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.A DAS, MR.D SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : , SC, SECONDARY EDUCATION Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 19.09.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call. Ms. N. M. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the state respondent. It appears that since on the last two occasions, i.e, 09.09.2025 and 17.09.2025, as well there were no representations on behalf of the petitioner. Today, when the matter is listed in the cause list with the remark ‘for dismissal’, despite the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner being reflected in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. That being so, the matter stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant