APHC010052432020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Moparthi Vijaya Sujatha Rani The Union Of India and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMIDI SATHYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) 2. S S VARMA (SC FOR NHAI) 3. A RAVINDRA BABU (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.11.2024, it is stated that the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ramidi Sathyanarayana the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Accordingly, the notice was unserved on the petitioner However, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 3360/2020 Moparthi Vijaya Sujatha Rani ...PETITIONER AND The Union Of India and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMIDI SATHYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) VARMA (SC FOR NHAI) A RAVINDRA BABU (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) The Court made the following: On 07.11.2024, it is stated that the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ramidi Sathyanarayana is no more and therefore, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Accordingly, the notice was served on the petitioner with a postal endorsement as “addressee left” However, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) On 07.11.2024, it is stated that the learned counsel for the petitioner, is no more and therefore, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Accordingly, the notice was with a postal endorsement as “addressee left”. However, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no 2 representation for the petitioner on 02.12.2024 and 20.01.2025, therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal. 2. Today, though the matter is listed “For Dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 22.01.2025 MSI 3 200 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 3360/2020 Date: 22.01.2025 MSI