Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:24553
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 819 of 2024
Decided on: 28.07.2025 Neeraj Shyam
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
… Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional
Advocate General for respondent-
State.
: Ms. Salochana Rana, Advocate for
respondent No. 3-Pollution Control
Board.
: Ms. Ranjana Pathania, Advocate vice
Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate for
respondent No. 6.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Taking into consideration the nature of reliefs prayed in the writ petition and the fact that the petition has been filed in the larger public interest, the same, as prayed for, is permitted to be withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file afresh on the format of public interest litigations. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge July 21, 2025 (narender)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?