1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 327 of 2016 1 - Ramadhar Dewangan S/o Padam Dewangan, Aged About 60 Years Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Post Pendri, Tehsil Rajnandgaon, Civil And Revenue District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.......Plaintiff , Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ganpat Dewangan And Another S/o S/o Padam Dewangan, Aged About 56 Years R/o Aakash Nagar Mahakali Colliery, Chandpur, Post Chandrapur, District Chandrapur, Maharashtra, Maharashtra 2 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its District Magistratem, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh........Defendants , District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Judgment on Board 19/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that he is having no instruction from the appellant as when he sent a letter to the sole appellant it was unserved with the endorsement that addressee has died, however, when he again wrote another letter to the legal heirs of Ramadhar Dewangan, it was reported that item delivered to Ramadhar ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.11.20 10:53:51 +0530 2 Dewangan, however, he is having no instruction either from Ramadhar Dewangan or his legal heirs and pleaded no instruction from the appellant. 2. In view of the above submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok