Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59039 (DEL)

VINITA SETHI v. STATE OF NCT DELHI

CRL.M.C./8901/2025 · 2025-12-12

Vikas Mahajan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8901/2025 VINITA SETHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Arora, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 12.12.2025 CRL.M.A. 37130/2025 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 8901/2025 3. The present petition has been filed seeking direction to the learned Trial Court for expeditious disposal of the petitioner’s application under Section 175(3) of BNSS. 4. Mr. Mayank Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed the petition under Section 175(3) BNSS in the month of May 2025. 5. The application was listed on 13.05.2025 when preliminary submissions were heard and action taken report was called from the concerned Police Station for the next date i.e. 07.07.2025. On 07.07.2025, after hearing the arguments on the application filed under Section 175(3), the matter was put up for clarification/orders on 05.08.2025. However, on the said date, no order was pronounced and the matter was simply re- notified for 06.11.2025. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2025 at 12:31:05 6. Since the date was long, the petitioner filed an application seeking preponement of the date. The application was allowed and accordingly, the date was preponed from 06.11.2025 to 10.10.2025. 7. Mr. Arora submits that on 10.10.2025, the learned Presiding Officer Court was on leave and the matter was therefore, re-notified on 15.10.2025. However, on 15.10.2025, the petitioner was given to understand that the file is not traceable. 8. He submits that the matter was thereafter, taken up on 06.11.2025 when again the learned Presiding Officer was on leave and the matter was re-notified to 23.02.2026. He submits that till date, the order which was due to be pronounced on 08.08.2025, has not been pronounced yet. 9. In view of the limited prayer sought, the learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the proceedings of the application under Section 175(3) of BNSS preferably on the next date or at least within a period of three months. 10. In view of the above, Petitioner is also granted liberty to move an application before the learned Trial Court seeking preponement of the date. 11. The petition stands disposed of. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J DECEMBER 12, 2025/dss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2025 at 12:31:05