1 2025:CGHC:56416 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 382 of 2024 1. Nand Kumar Patel S/o Late Shri Aasharam Patel Aged About 55 Years R/o Anupama Aasha Kunj, Behind Haribhumi Press, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Chief Secretary State Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Law And Legislative, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Housing And Environment, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Satish Kumar Singh S/o Shri Laxman Singh Aged About 66 Years Chairman Of The Chhattisgarh Rent Contral Tribunal, Old R.D.A. Building, 1st Floor, Shastri Chowk, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2025.11.20 11:38:56 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Manas Bajpai, Advocate For Respondent No.1 to 3 : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 19/11/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1. That, the Hon’ble Court may issue writ of Quo Warranto or any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions, to quash the impugned order dated 07.09.2021 (Annexure-P/1). 10.2. That, the Hon’ble Court may issue writ of Quo Warranto or any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions, for Respondent No.4 not to allow to continue on the post of Chairman CGRCT. 10.3. That, the Hon’ble Court may issue writ of Quo Warranto or any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions, to order/judgment passed by Rent Control Tribunal after the attending the age of 65 years Chairman of Rent Control Tribunal may be declare null and void. 10.4. That, the Hon’ble Court may issue writ of Quo Warranto or any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions, to impose penalty to Respondent no.1 to 3 an amount of Rs.5 lacs. 10.5. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief (s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.” 3 2. From the aforementioned reliefs it is apparent that appointment of respondent No.4 as Chairman, Chhattisgarh Rent Control Tribunal is put to challenge. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 would submit that respondent No.4 was appointed vide order dated 9.2.2021 and conditions of services were ordered on 7.9.2021. Term of respondent No.4 came to an end on 25.7.2025. 4. In view of above facts of the case, in particular submission of learned counsel for respondent No.4 that tenure of respondent No.4 as Chairman as already came to an end, I am of the view that nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-