Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59031 (MAD)

Babu @ Siva v. The state rep. by its The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/15247/2025 · 2025-06-23

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.15247 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.15247 of 2025 Babu @ Siva ... Petitioner Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police C-4, Rathinapuri Police Station Coimbatore (Cr.No.349 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.349 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.Anbu Selvan For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act and 25(1A) of Arms Act, in Crime No.349 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.15247 of 2025 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 2.143 kilograms of Ganja. The respondent, after following the mandatory provisions, seized the entire contraband, one illegal weapon, a black bag and 65 plastic packets. Hence the complaint. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case, only based on the confession statement of the co-accused and there is no recovery from the petitioner. He further submitted and the co-accused/A1, A2, A3 and A6 were all released on bail. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner is involved in two previous cases which are of similar nature. Hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the bad antecedents of the petitioners, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is very much required in this case. Hence, this Court is not inclined 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.15247 of 2025 to anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 23.06.2025 uma To 1. The Inspector of Police C-4, Rathinapuri Police Station Coimbatore 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.15247 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. uma Crl.O.P.No.15247 of 2025 23.06.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis