Dr.YLR,J W.P.No.36002 of 2025 APHC010697472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 36002/2025 Between: 1. MULPURI RANI, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO AGE 58 YEARS, R/O. AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE LINGAPALEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 2. MULPURI VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O. PRAKASA RAO AGED 61 YEARS, OCC CUITIVATION R/O. AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARVATI VEIAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , ELURU DISTRICT EIURU. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINTALAPUDI CIRCIE CHINTALAPUDI, ELURU DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , DHARMAJIGUDEM POLICE STATION DHARMAJIGUDEM, ELURU DISTRICT 5. MULPURI RAMA RAO, S/O. PRAKASA RAO AGED 58 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION R/O. AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Dr.YLR,J W.P.No.36002 of 2025 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering in civil disputes in between the petitioners and the 5th Respondent with respect to the lands in Sy. No. 33-3 and Sy. No. 190- 2 of Ayyaparajugudem Village, Lingapalem Mandal, Eluru District as illegal, arbitrary, malafidy, ultra-vires, contrary to law and against to the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Articles 14,19, and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th respondent with respect to the lands in Sy. No. 33-3 and Sy. No. 190-2 of Ayyaparajugude m Village, Lingapalem Mandal, Eluru District, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 & 4 not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th respondent with respect to the lands in Sy. No. 33-3 and Sy. No. 190-2 of Ayyaparajugudem Village, Lingapalem Mandal, Eluru District pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME Dr.YLR,J W.P.No.36002 of 2025 The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: “… to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering in civil disputes in between the petitioners and the 5th Respondent with respect to the lands in Sy. No. 33-3 and Sy. No. 190-2 of Ayyaparajugudem Village, Lingapalem Mandal, Eluru District as illegal, arbitrary, malafidy, ultra-vires, contrary to law and against to the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Articles 14,19, and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th respondent with respect to the lands in Sy. No. 33-3 and Sy. No. 190-2 of Ayyaparajugude m Village, Lingapalem Mandal, Eluru District…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that respondent Nos.3 and 4 are interfering in the civil dispute at the behest of respondent No.5. He further submits that a suit in O.S.No.109 of 2012 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Chintalapudi was preferred where decree was passed granting permanent injunction in favour of the 5th respondent herein. Later, the petitioners preferred an appeal and that was allowed by the learned Principal District Judge, West Godavari setting aside the judgment passed by the learned trial court. Aggrieved by that, second appeal was preferred by the 5th respondent vide S.A.No.733 of 2024 which was pending before this Court and Dr.YLR,J W.P.No.36002 of 2025 status quo order was granted by this Court. He further submits that petitioner made a case in Cr.No.37 of 2025 against respondent No.5. However, they filed criminal petition seeking for quashment of the same which is pending before this Court in Crl.P.No.7481 of 2025. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader after obtaining instructions from the respondent Nos.3 and 4 submits that that the respondents had never interfered in the civil dispute, but in the course of investigation in Cr.No.37 of 2025, the respondent Nos.3 and 4 has got the authority to summon the witness or the accused in that case. 5. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to interfere in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the 5th respondent. No costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________ DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO Date: 26.12.2025 Dvs Dr.YLR,J W.P.No.36002 of 2025 60 THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.36002 of 2025 Date: 26.12.2025 Dvs