SANJEEV KUMAR SAXENA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/6765/2025 · 2025-05-15
Vikram D Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59028 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59028 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:81129 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6765 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Saxena Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Srivastava Iii Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:
"a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the respondent no.2 to ensure the fixation of payment of salary to the petitioner on the promotional payment of office Superintendent Grade-II and also pay the current salary after fixation as well as arrears of salary with effect from 13.08.2024, the date when the petitioner submitted his joining on the post. b) issue a writ, order or direction the including a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondent no.2 to sympathetically consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 11.01.2025 and 26.03.2025 in accordance with law within stipulated period of time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case."
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed representation before the respondent no.2, however till date, no order has been passed.
4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that representation of the petitioner would be decided in a time bound manner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is hereby provided that the respondent no.2-Director of Education (Higher Education),U.P. at Prayagraj, shall decide the representation dated 11.1.2025 filed by petitioner in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order.
6. It is clarified that this Court has not decided the issue on merits and the authorities concerned shall independently apply its mind and pass order in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 16.5.2025 D. Tamang Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad