Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:56251
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5982 of 2025 1 - Smt. Neelam Sahu W/o Dinesh Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o Budhwaripara Ward No. 15 Dongargarh District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer Revenue Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5 - Bimla Sahu W/o Lt. Chottelal Sahu Aged About 60 Years R/o 564, Budhwaripara Ward No. 15 Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 6 - Santoshi Sahu D/o Lt. Chottelal Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o 564, Budhwaripara Ward No. 15 Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 7 - Tara Sahu D/o Lt. Chottelal Sahu Aged About 34 Years R/o 564, Budhwaripara Ward No. 15 Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Agnihotri, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 4/State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer
SB:
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD 19/11/2025 SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY
2
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief(s):-
“10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash the order dated 19.09.2025 passed in revenue case no. 202505093400020 A/70 year 2024-25 (Annexure P/1) in the interest of justice. 10.2 Any other relief which deemed fit and proper may also be issued looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the interest of the petitioner”
2. After arguing for sometime, on the objection being raised by the counsel for the Respondent/State with regard to maintainability of the writ petition,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail other alternate remedy available to him under law.
3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Registry is
directed to return back certified copies of the documents enclosed along with the writ petition after retaining photocopies of the same.
4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey