IN THE HI 210 Bhupinder Singh Punjab School Education Board CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. as Daily Wage Helper for the last 25 years, he though was granted regularization in the year 2011, which was wrongly his claim is squarely covered by the judgment in the case Singh and others v CWP-8109- petition on 24.05.2016, had directed to be hea decided on petitioners therein have been granted the due benefits. that the petitioner is entitled to the same relief and the respondents be directed to consider in terms thereof in a time bound manner also taking note of the judgments in the case of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Bhupinder Singh Versus Punjab School Education Board and another CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Sukhmani Tiwana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Behl, Advocate, for the respondents. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been working as Daily Wage Helper for the last 25 years, he though was granted regularization in the year 2011, which was wrongly claim is squarely covered by the judgment in the case Singh and others vs. Punjab School Education Board and others -2012, with which this Court while admitting the present petition on 24.05.2016, had directed to be hea decided on 23.11.2022, to which there was no challenge made and the petitioners therein have been granted the due benefits. that the petitioner is entitled to the same relief and the respondents be directed to consider in terms thereof in a time bound manner also taking note of the judgments in the case of Vinod Kumar and others vs. GH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2164-2012 (O & M) Date of decision: 26.05.2025 ....Petitioner and another ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been working as Daily Wage Helper for the last 25 years, he though was granted regularization in the year 2011, which was wrongly withdrawn, and that claim is squarely covered by the judgment in the case of Balwinder s. Punjab School Education Board and others, 2012, with which this Court while admitting the present petition on 24.05.2016, had directed to be heard, which came to be there was no challenge made and the petitioners therein have been granted the due benefits. She thus submits that the petitioner is entitled to the same relief and the respondents be directed to consider in terms thereof in a time bound manner also taking Vinod Kumar and others vs. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.27 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-2164-2012 -2- Union of India and others, Civil Appeal Nos.5153-5154 of 2024, decided on 30.01.2024 and Ushaben Joshi vs. Union of India and others, SLP (Civil) No.6427-2019, decided on 02.08.2024, to this limited prayer learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. 2. Without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the claim of the petitioner, taking note of the judgments, within a period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 26.05.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.27 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.