Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59016 (CHH)

M/S GULAB CHAND JAIN v. Mrs. Niharika Barik aged about 57 Years

CONT/1175/2025 · 2025-11-16

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:55849 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1175 of 2025 • M/s Gulab Chand Jain A Partnership Firm, Place Of Business At 2nd Floor, Arihant Complex, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur Chhattisgarh, Acting Through Its Partner Mr. Gulab Chand Jain S/o Ranidan Jain, Aged About 69 Years R/o Sadar Bagicha, Shailendra Nagar, Bank Of Baroda Line Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Mrs. Niharika Barik Aged About 57 Years Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Government Of Chhattisgarh Sector-19, North Block, Vikas Bhawan, Ground Floor, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh. 2. Mr. Bhim Singh Chief Executive Officer, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Civil Lines, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3. Mr. K.K. Katare Aged About 56 Years Chief Engineer, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Civil Lines, Raipur 492001 4. Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahu Aged About 55 Years Executive Engineer Cum Member Secretary, Project Implementation Unit, Cgrrda, District- Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 5. Mr. Amit Shukla, Director General, National Rural Infrastructure Development Agency Ministry Of Rural Development Government Of India, 15 Nbcc Tower 5th Floor, Bhikajicama Place, New Delhi ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshwardhan Parganiha, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate. (Hion’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 17/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order passed by this court has been complied with by the respondent authority, therefore, this contempt petition has become infrucutous. 2. Since the order passed by this Court has been complied with by this Court, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court. 3. Accordingly, contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.11.18 11:10:47 +0530