APHC010549742024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28732/2024 Between: DUNDI KOTIREDDY, S/O LATE SRI RAMIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION DOCTOR, PURNASAI HOSPITAL, 6TH LINE, GUNTURU VARI THOTA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE EAST, LALAPET POLICE STATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. KOTHAMASU PRASADA RAO SURYA PRASADA RAO, , S/O RAMA KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. OCCUPATION CHILLI COMMISSION BUSINESS, 1ST LINE, KRISHNA NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the civil disputes between petitioner and respondent no 4 is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14,19, and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to take necessary steps on the petitioners representation dt. 29/11/2024 and legal 2 notice dt. 02/12/2024 ensure that no coercive or adverse action is taken against the petitioner.” 2. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the Police have not received any representation from the Petitioner on 29.11.2024. It is further submitted that, based on the complaint given by Respondent No.4, the Petitioner was called to the Police Station for enquiry, but the Petitioner did not turn up. Police received legal notice dated 02.12.2024. Learned Assistant Government Pleader finally submits that the Police are not interfering in the financial disputes between the parties. 3. Sri Vattikuti Sreemannarayana, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:30.12.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28732 of 2024 Dt.30.12.2025 Dinesh