Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59002 (AP)

Chemuri Chengamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/36281/2025 · 2025-12-28

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010698172025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 36281/2025 Between: 1. CHEMURI CHENGAMMA, W/O. LATE CHEMURI SRINIVASULU AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O. D NO. 7-4, BALAKRISHNAPURAM ERUPEDU POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 517619 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BLDGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI- 517501 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517501 4. THE TAHSILDAR, , ERUPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517619 5. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517619 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 4and 5 in taking action on petitioner’s F Line Application dated 12.5.2025, FSNV012500730325 and Transaction ID No. TAFSNV012500730325 to survey the land and fix up the boundaries in Sy No. 60, 63/13 an extent of Ac.0.04 cents, 63/12 an extent of Ac. 0.19 cents and 63/16 an extent of Ac. 0.21 Cents situated at Merlapaka Village, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District and also in action of 2nd respondent in taking action on petitioner s representation dated 17.10.2025 is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents No. 4 and 5 to take action on petitioner s F Line Application and also direct the respondents 2and 3 to provide police aid at the time of surveying the above referred lands and fixing the boundaries in the interest of justice and to pass necessary order or orders as this Hon ble Court may deem fit. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents 4 &5 to take action on petitioner’s F Line Application dated 12.5.2025, vide FSNV012500730325 and Transaction ID No. TAFSNV012500730325 to survey the land and fix up the boundaries in Sy No. 60, 63/13 an extent of Ac.0.04 cents, 63/12 an extent of Ac. 0.19 cents and 63/16 an extent of Ac. 0.21 Cents situated at Merlapaka by taking Police aid asVillage, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District petitioner’s representation dated 17.10.2025 to thementioned in respondents 2 and 3 pending disposal of the above WP in the interest of justice and to pass necessary order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.36281 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The writ petition is filed for the following relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 4and 5 in taking action on petitioner’s F Line Application dated 12.5.2025, FSNV012500730325 and Transaction ID No. TAFSNV012500730325 to survey the land and fix up the boundaries in Sy No. 60, 63/13 an extent of Ac.0.04 cents, 63/12 an extent of Ac. 0.19 cents and 63/16 an extent of Ac. 0.21 Cents situated at Merlapaka Village, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District and also in action of 2nd respondent in taking action on petitioner s representation dated 17.10.2025 is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents No. 4 and 5 to take action on petitioner’s F Line Application and also direct the respondents 2and 3 to provide police aid at the time of surveying the above referred lands and fixing the boundaries in the interest of justice and to pass necessary order or orders…” 2. On a perusal of the relief, as the petitioners have some issues with the private people, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. 3. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Court. No costs. 4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt.29.12.2025 BV