SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010053922025 SABA/13/2025 Rakesh Tyagi --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Shreeyash Lalit alongwith Mr. Anchit Khokher, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. alongwith Mr. Vikas Uniyal, Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. V.K. Ahuja, Advocate for the complainant. 4. The present applicant is praying for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 175 of 2021, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station–Prem Nagar, District–Dehradun. 5. This is second anticipatory bail application of the applicant. The first anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn on 20.03.2025. 6. Earlier vide order dated 23.04.2025, this Court had granted interim protection to the applicant, but, learned counsel for the complainant submits before the Court that the applicant was not putting his appearance before the learned Trial Court continuously and on that basis, the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide its order dated 17.03.2026, had cancelled the ad-interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 7. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was under the impression that pursuant to grant of interim anticipatory bail, he was not supposed to appear before the Trial Court. It is further submitted that the other co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail. 8. Today, applicant is also present before this Court. He has given an undertaking before the Court that he would appear before the Trial Court on each and every date and only on unavoidable circumstances, he would move an exemption application. 9. Heard learned counsel for the State and perused the record. 10. Considering the fact that other co- accused have been granted anticipatory bail and also considering the undertaking given by the applicant before the Court, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail and as such the instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 11. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 12. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/court concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation. (ii) The applicant shall not approach any witness/victim in any manner, whatsoever. (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. 13. It is made clear that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail. (Alok Mahra J.) 28.07.2026 Ujjwal