APHC010540772024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28269/2024 Between: 1. MEDISETTI MAHALAKSHMI KANAKA RAJU, S/O (LATE) PENTAYYA, AGED 50 YRS OCC. BUILDER, FLAT NO. FF-202 , SAI SURYA TOWERS PITHAPURAM COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM.530003 AADHAR NO. 4895 8393 8343 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) SECRETARIAT, VELAGPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 3. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLI. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ATCHUTAPUPRAM POLICE STATION ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT 5. KURADA JOGA RAO, S/O KURADA JAGANNADHA RAO, AGED40 YRS D.N0.1-2A, VELPHURU VILLAGE, RAMBILLI MANDAL RAJA KODUR POST, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. BANDA VENKATA NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O (LATE) B. SIVA RAO, AGED 42 YRS D.NO.8-3-168E/2/26-30, RAJEEV NAGAR FLAT NO.302, PADMA REKHA APARTMENTS YOUSUF GUDA, HYDERABAD- 500045 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 4th Respondent in interferring into the Civil Disputes in connection with the Development Agreement cum General Power of Attorney dt.08th day of January 2021 between the Petitioner and the Un- Official Respondents 5 and 6 and also Pressurizing the Petitioner to Comply the terms of the said Development Agreement if not to Return the Site or to pay huge Compensation Etc., all are Illegal, Unlawful, Violation of Article 14,19,21,300-A- of the Constitution of India, Violation of Principles of Natural Justice, Violation of Police Standing Orders in interferring into the Civil Disputes Consequently to direct the Respondent No.4 not to Interfere or Presurrize the petitioner to Comply the terms of the Development Agreement dt.08-01-2021 or Call for the petitioner to the Police Station in the interst of the justice, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent not to Call the petitioner to the Police Station or harass or presurize the petitioner to Comply the terms of the Development Agreement dt.08-01-2021 in between the petitioner and the Un- Official Respondents, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. AKHIL KRISHNAN The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28269 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 4th Respondent in interferring into the Civil Disputes in connection with the Development Agreement cum General Power of Attorney dt.08th day of January 2021 between the Petitioner and the Un-Official Respondents 5 and 6 and also Pressurizing the Petitioner to Comply the terms of the said Development Agreement if not to Return the Site or to pay huge Compensation Etc., all are Illegal, Unlawful, Violation of Article 14,19,21,300-A- of the Constitution of India, Violation of Principles of Natural Justice, Violation of Police Standing Orders in interferring into the Civil Disputes Consequently to direct the Respondent No.4 not to Interfere or Presurrize the petitioner to Comply the terms of the Development Agreement dt.08-01-2021 or Call for the petitioner to the Police Station in the interst of the justice, and to pass.…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering with the civil disputes in between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that based on the complaint made by respondent No.5, a case in Cr.No.275 of 2023 for the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC was registered against the petitioner. Except that, police are not interfering in the civil disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law relating to the crime which has been registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28269 of 2024 Dated.30.12.2025 TVN 295