Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58989 (CHH)

ASHOK MUKHARJI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5930/2025 · 2025-11-12

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:55294 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5930 of 2025 • Ashok Mukharji S/o Late Shri Hemchand Mukharji Aged About 70 Years R/o Rama Valley, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Sub Divisional Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Additional Tahsildar Sakri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Revenue Officer Sakri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Tahsildar Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. Anil Raj Patwari Sakri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 7. K.K. Pathak Patwari, Sakri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 8. Shyam Lal Yadav Patwari, Sakri, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 9. Rajesh Shukla Patwari, Sakri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 10.Sunil Kumar Agrawal S/o Motilal Sultaniya R/o Ameri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 11. Smt. Nidhi Chawla W/o Jashbir Chawla R/o Ameri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 12.B.P.Singh S/o R.N. Singh R/o Ameri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 13.Shailendra Kumar S/o Inder Singh Saluja R/o Ameri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 14.Bhagchand S/o Sewaram Bajaj R/o Ameri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 15.Vikas Kukreja S/o Kanhaiya Kukreja R/o Ameri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 13/11/2025 1. Heard. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file appropriate application before the competent authority seeking demarcation of the land. 3. In view of submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. In the event petitioner submits application for demarcation, concerned authority shall consider the same expeditiously in accordance with law. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE