Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5898 (RAJ)

KAJAL VERMA W/O LATE SHRI SACHIN VERMA, D/O SHRI RATAN LAL PADIYAR v. MANOJ KUMAR KUMAWAT SON OF SHRI PRABHAT I LAL

CW/2930/2025 · 2025-04-16

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:16205] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2930/2025 Kajal Verma W/o Late Shri Sachin Verma, D/o Shri Ratan Lal Padiyar, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of D-10, Prem Colony, Panipech, Police Station Shastri Nagar, Jaipur At Present Resident Of Plot No. 15, Yuvraj Vihar Colony, Road No. 17, Vishwakarma, Jaipur. ----Applicant/Claimant No.1.Petitioner Versus 1. Manoj Kumar Kumawat Son Of Shri Prabhati Lal, Resident Of E-84, Kukarkheda, Mahapura, Murlipura Scheme, Polic Station Murlipura, Jaipur- 302016. (At The Time Of Accident Driver Of Vehicle Maruti Alto No. RJ-14-CA- 8670) 2. Kailash Chand Mali Son Of Shri B.L. Mali, Resident Of Ward No. 1, Chandji Wali Dhani, Chomu, District Jaipur. (At The Time Of Accident, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Maruti Alto No. RJ-14-CA-8670) 3. Iffco Tokiyo General Insurance Company Limited, Through Its Branch Manager, Through Branch Office Plot No. 101, First Floor A.R.G. Corporate Park, Gopal Bari, Ajmer Road, Fly Over, Jaipur (Raj.) (Insurance Company Of Vehicle Maruti Alto No. RJ-14-CA-8670.) (Validity From 18.07.2022 To 17.07.2023) Policy No. M.P.961599. ----Non-Claimants/Respondents 4. Balchand Bunkar Son Of Late Shri Shankar Lal (Father), Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of D-10, Prem Colony, Panipech, Police Station Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 5. Smt. Kamlesh Devi Wife Of Shri Balchand Bunkar (Mother), Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of D-10, Prem Colony, Panipech, Police Station Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. ----Applicant No.02 to 03/Claimants/Performa Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Kumar Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 16/04/2025 After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh application with better particulars before the learned tribunal for pre-mature release of the amount which has been kept in the fixed deposits. [2025:RJ-JP:16205] (2 of 2) [CW-2930/2025] Permission sought for is granted. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh application with better particulars before the learned tribunal. If any such application is filed by the petitioner, learned tribunal is directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. Stay application as well as pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/90