205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-10685-2017 Date of Decision: 25.09.2025 Prabhjit Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel, at the outset, submits that petitioner secured 22 Marks. He belongs to B.C. Category and in his category, cut off in the waiting list was 28 Marks, thus, he was not even in the waiting list. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner expressed his inability to controvert the aforesaid factual position. 3. The matter relates to selection of 2012-2013. The selected candidates have already joined service. A period of 12 years from the date of selection and 14 years from the date of advertisement has passed away. 4. In the backdrop, no interference is warranted. 5. Dismissed. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 25.09.2025 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.09.25 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document