- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13377 WP No. 105676 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 105676 OF 2024 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. GAVISIDDAVVA W/O. SIDDANAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE R/O. KOTAMUCHAGI, GADAG. 2. VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O. KALLAPPA BANNIKOPPA, AGE: MAJOR, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. BINNAL, KOPPAL. 3. BASAVARAJ S/O. SIDDANAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KOTAMUCHAGI, GADAG. 4. SOMASHEKHARAGOUDA S/O. SIDDANAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KOTAMUCHAGI, GADAG. 5. SHANKARGOUDA S/O. SOMASHEKHARGOUDA PATIL, AGE: MAJOR,, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAKKUNDI, GADAG. 6. SUMITRA W/O. KOTRAPPA HARTHI, AGE: MAJOR,, OCC. HOUSEWIFE R/O. LAKKUNDI, GADAG. 7. RUDRAGOUDA S/O. SOMASHEKHARAGOUDA PATIL, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13377 WP No. 105676 of 2024 AGE: MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. QILLA ONI, GADAG. 8. NINGANAGOUDA S/O. SOMASHEKHARAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KOTAMUCHAGI, GADAG. 9. MEENAKSHI W/O. KALAKANAGOUDA AGE: MAJOR, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. GADAG. 10. SHIVANADAGOUDA S/O. SOMASHEKHARAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: MAJOR, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. KOTAMUCHAGI, GADAG. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHUBHENDU A. AKALWADI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. LAND TRIBUNAL, GADAG, R/BY ITS SECRETARY-570001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA FIR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO DISPOSE OF THE PROCEEDINGS VIDE BEARING NO. KLR.SR/24A+24B +56+84+85+90 EXPEDITIOUSLY TIME BOUND MANNER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13377 WP No. 105676 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 12.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SH /CT-AN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 114